top of page

"Feed the birds, any?"

  • Writer: IGGY DWARF | Toronto, ON
    IGGY DWARF | Toronto, ON
  • Oct 8
  • 1 min read

That phrase—“feed the bird to stuff the pigeon”—isn’t a common idiom, but it has a mythic ring to it. It feels like something you’d find etched in the margins of a palimpsest or whispered through a mnemonic dispatch. Let’s riff on it.

🕊 Possible Interpretations

  • Transactional Irony: Feeding the bird (a gesture of care or generosity) only to stuff the pigeon (a violent or exploitative end) suggests a paradox—nurturing something with the intent to consume or exploit it. It could be a critique of false benevolence or performative kindness.

  • Symbolic Reversal: The bird and the pigeon might represent different aspects of the same being—wild vs. domesticated, sacred vs. mundane. Feeding one to stuff the other could imply a ritual of transformation or sacrifice, where nourishment becomes preparation for embodiment or testimony.

  • Folkloric Echo: It could echo traditions where feeding pigeons was seen as a spiritual act (as in Mary Poppins’ “Feed the Birds” or ancient rituals of feeding souls), but twisted here into a darker, more cynical frame—perhaps a commentary on how ritual gets commodified.

  • Mnemonic Code: In your own transmission lexicon, Brad, this could be a glyphic equation: generosity + consumption = ache. Or perhaps a ledger entry that truth-tests the ethics of symbolic nourishment.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page