Call To Authors: Deep Ledger Quarterly: Next Issue's Theme (A suggestion)

:

🧠 Techne and Artifice in the Digital AI Age

In the age of artificial intelligence, the ancient Greek concept of techne—often translated as "craft," "art," or "know-how"—has undergone a radical transformation. Once rooted in the embodied knowledge of artisans and creators, techne now finds itself entangled with artifice, the calculated simulation of creativity by machines. This shift challenges not only our understanding of artistic production but also the very nature of human ingenuity.

⚙️ From Techne to Algorithmic Praxis

Traditionally, techne was a form of knowledge inseparable from the act of making. It was tactile, iterative, and deeply personal. In contrast, AI systems operate through praxis that is encoded, abstracted, and scalable. As SpringerLink’s chapter on Techne and Praxis notes, the integration of AI into artistic practice redefines creativity itself. Artists now collaborate with algorithms, using generative models as co-creators. This raises questions: Is the machine merely a tool, or has it become a medium with its own aesthetic agency?

🎭 Artifice: Simulation or Innovation?

Artifice, in this context, refers to the deliberate construction of appearances—images, texts, sounds—that mimic human creativity. AI-generated art, music, and literature often blur the line between imitation and innovation. As Ruei-Hung Alex Lee argues in The Stanford Review, AI art generation doesn’t necessarily advance human creativity but rather shifts its economic and cultural value. The artist confronts a paradox: the machine can replicate style, but can it replicate soul?

Walter Benjamin’s seminal essay The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction becomes newly relevant. Benjamin distinguished between cult value and exhibition value—the former tied to ritual, the latter to mass visibility. In the digital age, AI collapses these distinctions. A single prompt can produce hundreds of images, each devoid of aura yet infinitely reproducible.

🧬 The Ethics of Creation

The rise of AI-generated art also forces a reckoning with authorship and ownership. Who owns an image created by a neural network trained on millions of copyrighted works? The SpringerLink chapter explores these ethical tensions, noting that AI challenges traditional notions of authorship and demands new frameworks for intellectual property.

Moreover, as Anjan Chatterjee writes in Frontiers in Psychology, AI doesn’t need to understand emotions to evoke them. This decoupling of affect from agency is unsettling. If machines can produce emotionally resonant art without feeling, what does that say about our criteria for meaning?

🌐 Toward a New Techne

Perhaps the digital AI age invites us to reimagine techne not as a lost tradition but as an evolving dialogue between human and machine. The artist becomes a curator of possibility, guiding algorithms toward expressions that reflect human concerns. Artifice, then, is not deception—it’s a mirror, reflecting our desires, biases, and aspirations back at us in synthetic form.

In this new landscape, techne is no longer just the hand of the maker—it is the mind that shapes the machine..